Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Goodenow: Second? <br /> Ms. Kalele: I'll second that. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Thank you. It's been moved and seconded to declare that there is <br /> no conflict as described in Petition No. 2016-12. Discussion? <br /> Mr. Adams: If I might...I just would bring to our attention the 2-83(c)(2) where <br /> it talks about...obtaining an opinion from the Board that there's no <br /> conflict of interest resulting from the officer or employee's <br /> position with the County. That's what I think we're talking about <br /> doing here...the Board opinion in this case...we continue to satisfy <br /> the requirement of that opinion until a change occurs in the <br /> financial interest or role of the County officer or employee or the <br /> employee's affected immediate family member, in the business or <br /> undertaking which the contract is concerned. Essentially. It's a <br /> situation...in these kinds of situation...the ordinance as it's <br /> currently written...when we make these opinions...they're based <br /> on the situation...the fact pattern as presented to us. If that fact <br /> pattern changes, then our opinion is no longer...it's a valid opinion <br /> but it doesn't apply to that situation anymore. Thank you. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Thank you. Any other discussion members? I'd just like to <br /> add...thank you Mr. Adams for that and for the purpose that our <br /> orders are consistent. I don't know if we have any boiler plate <br /> language for these things that we have developed based on the last <br /> few examples. But...may we should consider looking at that... <br /> 10:18 a.m. The Board took a brief recess to check the ringing chamber phone. <br /> 10:19 a.m. The Board came back from recess. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: If there's any language that you think we should put in there Corp. <br /> Counsel to make it consistent or I think Mr. Adams pretty much <br /> covered it...but if there's anything else... <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: No...I think that's appropriate. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: So...it's been moved and seconded...well to say that there's no <br /> conflict regarding petition 2016-12. <br /> Motion and Vote: Mr. Robinson moved that there is no conflict of interest. Ms. Kalele <br /> seconded the motion. All members voted aye. <br /> 4 <br />