Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Goodenow: It's a moot point because on the form...the petitioner did say they <br /> were okay with an open hearing. I want to be clear here <br /> because...you're saying the petitioner is.... <br /> Mr. Adams: It's a third-party petition. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Even though they're married and their spouse and it may relate to <br /> her County work. <br /> Mr. Adams: If there's a decision that's made that finds no conflict for <br /> example...it will be no conflict for the employee...not for the <br /> owner of the private entity. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Well that makes sense. I don't know corp. counsel do you...what <br /> if to say that they wanted a closed hearing...would we say no? <br /> They can't have one? <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: Well...the way the rules read...that right or decision belongs to the <br /> officer or employee and not to the third-party. Mr. Adams is <br /> correct, but it's moot because he said it's okay for the open <br /> hearing. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: I'm sorry if his wife was here...even though she's not the <br /> petitioner...she could say hey I want a closed hearing. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: Yeah...because it pertains to her... <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Yeah I see...but you're the only one here today? <br /> Mr. Oshiro: Yeah. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: And you don't mind if we proceed... <br /> Mr. Oshiro: No. <br /> Mr. Adams: Sorry for the technicality. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: No...I learned a lot. Thank you that's very good. Would you like <br /> to make a statement then? <br /> Mr. Oshiro: What do I have to state? <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Well...we've got your written submission, but if you want to add <br /> anything or clarify anything.... <br /> Mr. Oshiro: No. You have any questions? <br /> 6 <br />