Laserfiche WebLink
2015-03 and so I would like to call up...petitioner first? The <br /> petitioner...is Mr. Hyland available? <br /> Ms. Sweeney: Chair Mr. Hyland has a representative here...Yvonne Leiser. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: If I could ask our Counsel. Is that...problematic I mean...I don't <br /> know if this person is an attorney... <br /> Mr. Murai: If I may...you're not required to be an attorney to represent a party <br /> in an administrative proceeding. In other words Mr. Hyland...well <br /> here's my concern is...we don't have Mr. Hyland here to tell us <br /> that he's being represented by someone. Not that I'm casting <br /> aspersions on this person's ability to represent Mr. Hyland...but <br /> certainly it's...I would certainly suggest to the Board that we <br /> somehow confirm that Mr. Hyland has authorized representation. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Kohala. <br /> Ms. Sweeney: Chair if I may. The lady sitting here is in possession the October <br /> 28 letter that she just wants to read publicly that Mr. Hyland <br /> submitted to the Board. <br /> Ms. Leiser: Handed to me by Mr. Hyland. <br /> Ms. Sweeney: Handed to her by Mr. Hyland. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: It would've been something during the public testimony, but I <br /> think since it's clearly his words...please go ahead and read <br /> your...read the letter. <br /> Mr. Murai: I'm sorry Madame Chair. Are we accepting this as public <br /> testimony? Or as a...is it being read as public testimony or being <br /> read by a representative of Mr. Hyland. I think there's a <br /> distinction. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: I would suggest it be public testimony. If we don't have <br /> authorization from Mr. Hyland saying you know I'm appointing <br /> her. I think we let her read it just as public testimony. It's my <br /> opinion anyway. <br /> Mr. Adams: I'm not sure that it actually is much of a distinction given that <br /> it's...we recognize it as Mr. Hyland's words and we accepted as <br /> that. The fact that she's reading it without any additional <br /> discussion of her own...I understand the point in terms of is it <br /> the...is it a representative meaning...is it the petitioner's testimony <br /> versus is it public testimony. I'm of the opinion that we need to be <br /> 12 <br />