My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1999-09-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:30:06 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 3:12:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
9/8/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-09-08 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
function falls to Public Works by our subdivision ordinance. Also, the Chief Engineer <br />is responsible for certain standards with respect to roads that, if it were in one <br />department, would be easier to streamline the process. That's really where I see the <br />public benefit. <br />YOSHIYAMA: You know the cost of this? <br />GOLDSTEIN: No. <br />YOSHIYAMA: I guess I don't understand one stop processing from this <br />standpoint. Say, in the Planning Department and Public Works, are we talking about <br />a person handling a variation of this process or permitting, or are we talking about <br />moving the functions from two different departments, putting them in one division and <br />still having to go through various stages within that division? Because then all we did <br />was make a move and not get any benefit out of it. <br />GOLDSTEIN: I think if you had it combined, then you can start revising things so <br />that, in fact, you would be getting rid of some of the actual redundancies. For example, <br />in processing a building permit and, for example, some of the definitions, some of these <br />things can go on without a Charter Amendment and without necessarily combining the <br />actual bodies and divisions. But I'll tell you, I think that the practical reality is as long <br />as there's two different bodies, they're going to be saying, that's not my kuleana, it's <br />yours and there is this constant finger pointing and things falling through the gap, <br />• whereas if you had them actually combined in a division, would be lessened. I'm not <br />saying it would be totally removed, but it would be lessened. <br />YOSHIYAMA: Okay, thank you. <br />RAY: Roland. <br />HIGASHI: In your department, how many people are involved in the <br />permitting process? The plan approval person, is that a full time position? <br />KOKUBUN: Eight. <br />GOLDSTEIN: He thinks eight. Positions as opposed to people that we have on <br />board right now, there's a difference, but eight. <br />HIGASHI: Eight full time people. Is that all they do or they do that and a <br />variety of other things? <br />GOLDSTEIN: That's pretty much all they do. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.