My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 2009-08-14.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2010
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 2009-08-14.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:47 AM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:21:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2009
Meeting date
8/14/2009
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 2009-08-14
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas
COMM. 024 Ford, B - Request for Presentation
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
COMM. 025 Site Locations for Public Hearings
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2010\Agendas\Communications (agenda items)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHR. HAITSUKA: CA -4 concerns the proposals from Mr. Ben, Director of Human <br />Resources. Is there any discussion on this proposed amendment? Do I have a motion to <br />approve the first reading of CA -4? <br />MS. JARMAN: So moved. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Mr. Hookano, do you have a comment? <br />MR. HOOKANO: Yes, I was wondering if the Commission will discuss whether to split it <br />into three separate proposals. I sent a memo making that suggestion. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Do you have a recommendation, Mr. Hookano? <br />MR. HOOKANO: Yes, I made the recommendation that it be divided into three separate <br />proposals because it encompasses basically three different subject matters. One would be the <br />civil service laws section, one would be the removal of certain directors, and the other being <br />the amendments to the merit appeals board membership. I saw those as three distinct <br />questions and I recommend to the Commission that it be divided as such. <br />Mr. Nahale -a moved to approve the proposal by Commission <br />Attorney, Levi Hookano to divide CA -4 into three separate <br />questions. Seconded by Mr. Shumway and carried <br />by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Honma, Jarman, Kaulukukui, <br />Kawauchi, Kealoha, Nahale -a, Shumway, <br />Osborne and Chair Haitsuka. <br />Noes: None. <br />Absent: Commissioners Fuertes and Unger. <br />MR. HOOKANO: Mr. Chair, now it is divided into three separate proposals, so now you <br />move those three up. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: We are going to split up this proposed amendments into three separate <br />ones. <br />MR. HOOKANO: CA -4 is now split into three questions. You will still have to approve <br />them at first reading. <br />MS. KAWAUCHI: Mr. Chair, would it be then a question of approval at first reading for <br />CA -4, CA -5, CA -6. <br />MR. HOOKANO: That is probably how they would be re- numbered, so that sounds <br />appropriate to me. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.