Laserfiche WebLink
CHR. HAITSUKA: Thank you. Ms. Kawauchi. <br />Ms. Kawauchi moved to amend the last sentence <br />in subsection (a) of CA -15 to read, "Deposits to <br />the fund will occur at a minimum of twice a year, <br />but directly after the majority of the taxes have <br />been collected, and no later than March and again <br />in September of each fiscal year after the tax <br />collection due dates." Seconded by Ms. Jarman. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Is there any discussion? Ms. Jarman. <br />MS. JARMAN: I have a question; could Nancy Crawford come forward? I've been on <br />the Commission long enough with Alapaki to now have these thoughts come to my mind <br />about how specific to get. I seconded it because I think it is an important issue; but what <br />I worry about is that this is a Charter amendment, and how long have we had in this <br />county the tax collections being essentially February and August, when the tax bills are <br />due, and what are the chances of that changing? I would hate for us to put in March and <br />September if that were to change; but I totally understand the point that Commissioner <br />Kawauchi is making. <br />NANCY CRAWFORD <br />(At this time Nancy Crawford, Finance Director, came forward to address members of the Charter <br />Commission.) <br />MS. CRAWFORD: I can't tell you how long it has been. It's probably for as long as this <br />has been in the County's hands, and perhaps before that, in the State. I'm not sure that it <br />is likely; we don't have plans to change it, but it certainly could. In general, I think it's <br />better to be less specific in the Charter, because it does allow for that flexibility, if <br />something else should change. We felt that having the language that said, "... directly <br />after the majority of the taxes have been collected..." which is twice a year. Although, I <br />would say it is in September and again in March; if you are looking at the fiscal year, the <br />first payment is collected in September. My recommendation would be not to tie it down <br />to those months. <br />MS. JARMAN: If you were to interpret this the way it is without the proposed <br />amendment, "...directly after the majority of taxes have been collected..." and assuming <br />the system doesn't change, when would the deposits be made? <br />MS. CRAWFORD: In the months that you have mentioned. Our first tax collection <br />comes in near the end of August, and it takes a while for those all to be posted; and so the <br />first transfer would be sometime in September. One of the reasons we didn't want to pin <br />it down too much, as much as it currently reads in the County Code; does not benefit the <br />land fund. This is more beneficial, because instead of waiting until December to transfer, <br />we would transfer it right after our majority collections. Then we also have the freedom <br />to make another transfer, as it goes around the year, we would at least, at a minimum, do <br />11 <br />