Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Kawauchi moved to amend her previous <br />motion to change "will" to "shall." Seconded <br />by Ms. Jarman, and carried by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Honma, Jarman, <br />Kawauchi, Kealoha, Nahale -a, <br />Osborne, Shumway and Chair Haitsuka. <br />Noes: None. <br />Absent: Commissioners Fuertes, Kaulukukui <br />and Unger. <br />MS. JARMAN: That was just a vote on changing "will" to "shall;" now we have to vote <br />on the main motion. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: So, that was a vote on the motion to amend the motion. So the vote <br />now is on Ms. Kawauchi's motion to amend subsection (a). Is there any further <br />discussion? <br />The motion to delete the last sentence in <br />subsection (a) of CA -15 and to replace it <br />with, "Deposits to the fund shall occur at <br />a minimum, on a quarterly basis" was <br />carried by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Honma, Jarman, <br />Kawauchi, Kealoha, Nahale -a, <br />Osborne, Shumway and Chair Haitsuka. <br />Noes: None. <br />Absent: Commissioners Fuertes, Kaulukukui <br />and Unger. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Is there any further discussion on CA -15 as amended? <br />MS. HONMA: I have one question. In section (c) they talk about preservation; and <br />when the original thing came out, they didn't have any money appropriated for <br />maintenance or preservation. Does that mean that they want to change that and allow <br />money to be used for preservation? The very first one that came out said that no money <br />was to be used for maintenance or preservation, if I remember correctly. When I was <br />reading through this, I now see that they have preservation of historic or culturally <br />important land areas, protection of natural resources, and so on. Does that now mean that <br />money can be used for preservation and those kinds of things? And I'm assuming that <br />maintenance is a part of that preservation. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: I don't know. <br />19 <br />