Laserfiche WebLink
MR. GOODENOW: Yes, I will. I'll prepare it right now. If you wouldn't mind, CA -12 is <br />much easier, but if I'm not back, would you postpone that too? <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: So, why don't we also skip the discussion on CA -7 in Communication <br />256.4 until we resolve the language in the proposed ballot question? <br />CA -9 RELATING TO ELECTRONIC POSTING OF SPECIAL MEETING NOTICES <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Let's move on to CA -9 in Communication 258. Do I have a motion to <br />adopt the proposed ballot language for CA -9? <br />Mr. Kaulukuki moved to adopt the proposed ballot <br />language for CA -9 as stated in Communication 258. <br />Seconded by Ms. Osborne and carried by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Jarman, Kaulukukui, <br />Kealoha, Nahale -a, Osborne, Shumway, <br />Unger and Chair Haitsuka. <br />Noes: None. <br />Absent: Commissioners Fuertes, Honma, and <br />Kawauchi. <br />CHR. HAITSUKA: Let's go to Communication 256.4, with respect to CA -9. We have some <br />proposed language from the League of Women Voters. Do I have a motion to adopt the <br />language proposed by the League of Women Voters? <br />Ms. Osborne moved to approve the League of <br />Women Voters proposed summary language <br />for CA -9 as stated in Communication 256.4. <br />Seconded by Mr. Shumway and carried by the <br />following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Jarman, Kaulukukui, <br />Kealoha, Osborne, Shumway, <br />Unger and Chair Haitsuka. <br />Noes: None. <br />Absent: Commissioners Fuertes, Honma, Kawauchi <br />and Nahale -a. <br />25 <br />