MIN CHC 1989-02-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

be those areas which supply water to our system. And all the way down to. . .well , there' s five categories anyway. So through this process , you know, they have pretty good control , I think, on the watershed. . . in the PE category, I don' t . . .you cannot do any logging, I think, for example, or build any houses (inaudible) . So, I think we' re kind of. . .well , I think that part is pretty good. Now, the State Department of Health is proposing, because of EPA requirements , proposing regulations on waste facilities and. . . they have. . . I think they' re very strict on what you can dispose of and what you cannot , in most of the areas. One of the problems , if it ' s a problem with. . .we see most of it in herbicides and pesticides which come into the water supply. But even these are such a minimal amount that , well it ' s . . .would be able to meet the requirements of safe drinking water. The only thing is they might make the act more stringent and then there might be a violation then. It ' s just less trouble. . . the banning from the violation. CUSHNIE: We need to be able to look ahead at least ten years in helping to develop a support structure through the Charter. And if we do begin to share the philosophy that water is of the utmost concern on the island , would you like to assume any further responsibilities or control over? SEWAKE: Well , I think that kind of control should be with state. . . state and federal agencies . BETHEA: What kind of control? SEWAKE: Control of water quality in its natural state. JUVIK: Excuse me, just to follow up on the watershed issue, your points regarding DLNR, protection of the watershed areas , I think generally prevail with the exception of Kona, where most of the mauka lands are not in the conservation district . In fact , they' re in the agricultural district. I just finished a study of the Kona watersheds and one of my. . .a number of recommendations was that the County might consider a special water district for that area in order to acquire either. . .not necessarily require the land , but require protection easements for forested areas that might be essential to the water needs of that area in the future, since for historical (inaudible) Kona does not have substantial conservation-zoned lands up mauka. My point is , as I read the Charter, you have those powers at the present time. I mean, if you wanted to. . . I mean, I know, in the past , the commission is not in the business of acquiring watershed per se, because. . . you realize being on the DLNR, but there is nothing to stop you under the Charter from acquiring the watershed, is there? SEWAKE: No. 101