My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1989-05-17
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1990
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1989-05-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:51 AM
Creation date
4/9/2018 12:43:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1989
Meeting date
5/17/1989
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1989-05-17
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1990\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GREENWELL: I was thinking. In the old days , the <br /> committee. . . results of a committee between the community <br /> and the administration, and they would bring ideas in <br /> fact to the administration or to the park, where there <br /> would be one voice rather than five or six different <br /> groups . It was like the committee in Kona. It was at <br /> one time a number of different organizations that had <br /> come together. I was just wondering whether it might be <br /> a good idea to have an official committee kind of thing <br /> in each district? <br /> TANIMOTO: We certainly appreciate your comment. <br /> And that thought was mulled over. We' re not certain how <br /> . . .whether we should go to a district to form <br /> committees. But I think that is your intent , right? <br /> GREENWELL: Uh-huh. <br /> TANIMOTO: To take the six districts and say, we <br /> will have a recreational parks committee from each <br /> particular district , whether we have a special project or <br /> not. But to give input into the County, like the liaison <br /> between the administration and the people of the <br /> districts. <br /> GREENWELL: Right. <br /> TANIMOTO: That certainly should be taken into <br /> consideration further now that you bring it up. But we <br /> were kind of going on the basis of a facility there and <br /> taking away the official word of commission or recre. . . <br /> committees. Because sometimes in my mind, those things <br /> invokes thoughts on the person who gets elected to the <br /> committee or commission, like God or somebody diedand <br /> went to heaven and said , now you have the right to tell <br /> these guys what to do versus the adopted program, or it ' s <br /> a self-help. . . or a community self-help situation where <br /> they' re taking responsibility for needs that they see. <br /> It ' s a joint venture versus I 'm giving you authority now <br /> to tell so-and-so, or. . .sometimes we have problems with <br /> people championing a certain project. And if they' re on <br /> the committee, then. . . it ' s not necessarily the person who <br /> really has the need that ' s being voiced out. In <br /> different areas in Kona , I mean, I know I have a problem <br /> there with North and South Kailua town versus Kealakekua <br /> in particular projects . . . <br /> GREENWELL: That ' s gone on 75 years. <br /> TANIMOTO: Yeah, and we ' re not trying to take the <br /> position of saying, well until you guys know what you <br /> want to do, we won' t do anything. We more or less take <br /> that adopt-a-park situation or an adopt-a-facility <br /> 374 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.