Laserfiche WebLink
powers. We always speak of the American system as having <br /> three levels , the Administrative, the Legislative and the <br /> Judicial branches always counteract each other and balance <br /> each other. I feel when you make a commission form you've <br /> got a fourth branch of government. In the case of the Water <br /> Board when they came up and told you that they did not want <br /> to see any control from the Mayor ' s office on approval from <br /> the County Council as far as rates go, I think that the <br /> County Council should make the final determination. Because <br /> after all the people that are running it and the final tax- <br /> payer that is paying it, there must be somebody that is <br /> accountable at some point in time to the taxpayer. And that <br /> is the elected official . Otherwise you have a commission <br /> form who by their action has the forcer ,toeff.ect_!e law, second <br /> the rules but nobody can contest it. There is no way that <br /> the citizens would be able to contest the rule. It has gbt <br /> to be someone to make the approval who is also accountable <br /> and that is the elected official. Okay, such as the County <br /> Council , county-wide, the County is the one to make the final <br /> adoption and I think that is correct. So, I think , one, as <br /> far as all three or four commissions go, one, it basically <br /> stays the. same, fine, the generalsupervision of control still <br /> must remain the same or you might put in coordi .ation or <br /> redefine it if you want to. Coordination, fine, a language <br /> change. But they must have some kind of coordination or <br /> control from the Mayor' s office. Point:= one, for strictly <br /> business reasons. Point two, if you are going to think of <br /> maybe abolishing a few commissions, put them all as divisio2s. <br /> My basic thinkingis that I would go along with abolishing <br /> Commissions of Liquor, Civil Service and Water. <br /> MR. ISHIDA: Mr. Mayor, the problem, or the concern, as I <br /> gather from hearing the other previous departments testify <br /> before us as far as the general supervision provision was that <br /> they felt it was ambiguous and nobody really knew what it <br /> meant. Is there any of that situation as far as the <br /> administration is concerned? <br /> MAYOR MATAYOSHI : I don ' t know, I don ' t have any problems. <br /> There is the feeling that this general supervision and control <br /> some of them, as I understand it, and I did talk to the Police <br /> Chief about it. Point one, I guess the Police Chief made one <br /> comment about this, is that we would be meddling into the <br /> administrative areas of the department. And so I called'_him. <br /> I have never meddled in the departments operational system <br /> and he agreed. But it says the "general supervision and <br /> control" may be interpreted that you are going to meddle into <br /> that and I can appreciate that in the case of the Police <br /> Department, maybe the Mayor should back off for the political . <br /> But there must be coordination somewhere. In other words , <br /> like this last budget. If he sends me a request for a hundred <br /> additional employees , there is no_ way I can fund that thing <br /> unless I can raise taxes so we are going to have to cut it <br /> -13-. <br />