My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-02-06
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-02-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:08:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
2/6/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-02-06
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There are also functions, for example, like <br /> our transportation planning and which agency should be <br /> responsible in handling this. Whether it should be the <br /> Planning or the Public Works Department. <br /> There are many issues and what I would like <br /> to do is to reserve some time to study these issues in the <br /> total context of the administrative structure and then come <br /> forth with my comments and recommendations to the County <br /> Charter Commission. At this point in time, I have some <br /> preliminary feelings but, again, for the advice to be mean- <br /> inful in something as major an undertaking as this , I think <br /> that I would like to reserve some time to think about it. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: You mean to say, Mr. Fuke, <br /> that ,after being in this department for how many years? <br /> MR. FUKE: Officially, as a Planning Director <br /> as of May, 1977. So just approaching 2 years. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Prior to that you were with <br /> the department? <br /> MR. FUKE: That is correct. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: And you know of nothing that <br /> you could come up with now after having worked under this <br /> Charter provision for that long? <br /> MR. FUKE: No, no. There are, you know, <br /> certain areas within the Charter which provide some. . .I think <br /> which is in need of certain kind of editorial or cleaning up. <br /> There is no question about that but I think that what I would <br /> want to do is not only address myself to the specific respon- <br /> sibilities that are currently assigned to the office, but I <br /> think we have to. . . .I feel, anyway, for the Charter Commission <br /> to evaluate the functions of only our office would be. . .well , <br /> would not really be the best way of evaluating the entire <br /> planning and implementation function of the thing. We would <br /> have to evaluate in total , in context, the other agencies. <br /> Particularly, the Research and Development. The Public Works <br /> Department and of course, our office. <br /> We all have overlapping kinds of functions. <br /> Maybe it could be greater_ centralized or continued in the <br /> same pattern. <br /> There has also been, like over the last:year <br /> or so a considerable amount of changing in terms of how <br /> certain kinds of, how the Planning Commission actions are <br /> handled. Increasingly, the Commission 's actions have assumed <br /> what is called a contested case procedure, whereby a guy <br /> applying for a variance or applying for a rezoning action, <br /> the setting before the Planning Commission approach is almost <br /> like a courtroom setting where you would have advocate as <br /> well as those guys against the petition coming forth in the <br /> same testimony and all that stuff. And I think that these <br /> -26- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.