Laserfiche WebLink
CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Any other discussion? <br /> MR. OMONAKA: A question, Mr. Chairman. Harlan, <br /> then are you saying that all department heads other than those <br /> that are set up like commissions, should have confirmation by <br /> the council on appointment? <br /> MR. CADINHA: As we go through the departments, <br /> I anticipate, just like Richard said, and we didn ' t get-together <br /> prior to the meeting, but I feel that way,_because as a practical <br /> matter, our council is unable to get to some departmentsin the <br /> county, where the person does not need council approval. The <br /> reception to councilmen that are feeling constituency pressure <br /> all the time, is either hot or cold, depending upon whether they <br /> need approval and from the broad philosophical outlook, I <br /> personally feel , and we've had this kind of testimony, that <br /> the council should be strengthened a little bit. I think this <br /> is a good way to add that strength and yet the mayor still has <br /> his administrative leeway. This does nothing to his administra- <br /> tive powers, at all . But it stops anyone in the future that may <br /> be wanting to line up some ducks on a fence and layer the nest, <br /> so to speak. This way, when it has got to come for confirmation <br /> every time, I think it is an additional safety valve. That is <br /> my logic. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Is there any other discussion? <br /> It has been moved and seconded that we approve Section 5-3.2 on <br /> Appointment and Removal of the director of finance as amended that <br /> the : director of finance shall be appointed by the mayor and <br /> confirmed by the council and the removal will still be the pre- <br /> rogative of the mayor. . . <br /> MR. ISHIDA.• Maybe on that language, just to be <br /> y <br /> consistent, I don ' t know if legal counsel will go along with <br /> this but, the language on the corporation counsel reads, "shall <br /> be appointed bythe mayor with the approval of the council. " <br /> t <br /> Now, as far as just language-wise, legal counsel, which is <br /> better? Do you say confirmed, or just with approval? <br /> MR. ODA: Approval seems to be a kind of a <br /> relaxed term, where confirm seems to have a stronger connotation. <br /> That ' s the feeling I get. I would think confirmation is better. <br /> Approval is a little too broad and vague. <br /> MR. YANAGA: So what you are saying is the finance <br /> department head is appointed by the mayor and will get approval <br /> confirmation by the council. To remove him you will get <br /> another confirmation by the council. <br /> MR. CADINHA: No, the mayor can fire him. Just - <br /> for approval. Nothing against Stanley. I think the guy has done <br /> a good job. But just in the future, it ' s a good thing. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Is there any other discussion? <br /> Are you ready for the question? Section 5-3. 2. It has been <br /> moved and seconded that the wording be changed that the director <br /> of finance shall be appointed by the mayor, confirmed by the <br /> council and may be removed by the mayor. <br /> (A roll call vote was taken and the <br /> motion was carried. ) <br /> -17- <br />