My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-07-11
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-07-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 10:37:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
7/11/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-07-11
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in the next time is going to be going, to the constituents <br /> in the area that he was voted in from. Now, if a person is <br /> voted into office from basically one area, he is going to <br /> consider that area over the other area. Now, when you have <br /> four people that are voted from that one area, that becomes <br /> very strong, the majority, and the outside lying places--and <br /> I use the word "'outside" very strong, are "outside. " <br /> Whether they are Republican or Democrats has very little to <br /> do with it and I agree with you, the party system is a great <br /> thing, but I do very honestly think we have to come up with <br /> an equal share for every vote, as close as we can. It is <br /> a hard job. I don ' t envy any of you sitting there, one bit, <br /> of what you have to come up with, but I think you guys can <br /> come up with a strong and much better proposal if you <br /> reconsider. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Mr. Moss, i certainly believe <br /> that the West Hawaii Committee' s address on district <br /> representation has been well received and should my fellow <br /> commissioners decide to move for reconsideration of <br /> reapportionment we will be very happy to consider your- <br /> proposal. <br /> ourproposal. <br /> MR. MOSS: Thank you, very much, Mr. Schutte. <br /> Any questions? <br /> other <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Thank you, Mr. Moss. <br /> MR. MOSS: Thank you. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Do we have anymore testimony <br /> from the audience? We' ll have a short recess. <br /> RECESS: At 4:Q2 p.m. the Chair called for a :short recess. <br /> RECONVENE: At 4: 15_ p.m. the -meeting wasreconvened. <br /> BALLOT CHAIRMAN SAKATA: We will continue with the <br /> DESIGN: Business of the Day and ask George Tamashiro <br /> to address us on ballot design. <br /> MR. TAMASHIRO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman and <br /> members of the commission. I thank you for the opportunity <br /> to be of service to you today. I do not have a presentation <br /> but rather I would like to cite some of the pros and cons of <br /> utilizing the punch card ballots for the special charter <br /> amendment ; election. Also, I will try to answer whatever <br /> questions you may have in the area of ballot design as well <br /> as election process. So, if I may, I would like to <br /> distribute some samples of prior charter amendment type <br /> ballots that I brought with me. <br /> -11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.