Laserfiche WebLink
can be worked out to the satisfaction to have the necessary <br /> representation. <br /> The second thing I would like to speak on is <br /> the desirability of a ceiling on spending in the county govern- <br /> ment. We live in a time of inflation. It is obvious that as <br /> population increases, as the demand for services increase, as <br /> costs rise, as technology changes we require, undoubtedly, <br /> greater expenditures in our county government. Just as every <br /> other facet of our governing bodies do. However, I 'think it <br /> would be most beneficial if we were to place a ceiling upon <br /> this amount of moneys that can be appropriated for whatever <br /> expenditures. Again , this would have to be the technicalities <br /> of how this is worked out-would have to be studied. But the <br /> advantage is, as I see it, in placing ceilings on spending is <br /> forcing our government to place priorities on the expenditures <br /> that are made, where, perhaps those priorities do not exist <br /> today. <br /> For instance, it would seem somewhat inapp- <br /> ropriate to me that we would build a racetrack in one community <br /> when another community doesn 't have a fire station or 24-hour <br /> police service. A ceiling on expenditures would necessarily <br /> force the people spending these tax funds to place priorities <br /> on what is to be spent.and where._Of= course we- need a base to <br /> establish how much increase could be allowed over a period of <br /> time. But, again, those are technicalities that I am sure our <br /> wise and good people can come to grips with. <br /> The third item that I would address is the <br /> matter of when we vote on any changes that you folks propose <br /> to be made in the County Charter.;-It is my understanding that <br /> to hold a special election in this county comes to a sum of <br /> some $60,000 give or take a few. The charter itself mandates <br /> that the charter be reviewed every ten years. It does not <br /> mandate, however, exactly when any revisions must be voted on. <br /> I believe it states that it can be at a general election. At <br /> the next general election or at a special election. I would propose <br /> that while what-we discuss as changes are important, they are <br /> certainly not earthshattering and do not require a special <br /> election. What you good folks decide to put before the public <br /> to be voted on could just as well wait until the 1980 general <br /> election as to spend $60,000 for a special election in 1979. <br /> Thank you, that is all. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: With regard to the concept of <br /> one-man, one-vote, do you have any idea as to how many council <br /> members we should have? <br /> MR. ANDERSON: I personally favor nine. I <br /> would see the island being divided into 9 districts of approxi- <br /> mately equal population. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: What happens if the boundaries <br /> are not within the so-called communities that have rather close <br /> relations to one another? <br /> - 5 - <br />