My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-04-17 PH
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearing
>
CHC 1979-04-17 PH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:29:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
4/17/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-04-17
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
can be worked out to the satisfaction to have the necessary <br /> representation. <br /> The second thing I would like to speak on is <br /> the desirability of a ceiling on spending in the county govern- <br /> ment. We live in a time of inflation. It is obvious that as <br /> population increases, as the demand for services increase, as <br /> costs rise, as technology changes we require, undoubtedly, <br /> greater expenditures in our county government. Just as every <br /> other facet of our governing bodies do. However, I 'think it <br /> would be most beneficial if we were to place a ceiling upon <br /> this amount of moneys that can be appropriated for whatever <br /> expenditures. Again , this would have to be the technicalities <br /> of how this is worked out-would have to be studied. But the <br /> advantage is, as I see it, in placing ceilings on spending is <br /> forcing our government to place priorities on the expenditures <br /> that are made, where, perhaps those priorities do not exist <br /> today. <br /> For instance, it would seem somewhat inapp- <br /> ropriate to me that we would build a racetrack in one community <br /> when another community doesn 't have a fire station or 24-hour <br /> police service. A ceiling on expenditures would necessarily <br /> force the people spending these tax funds to place priorities <br /> on what is to be spent.and where._Of= course we- need a base to <br /> establish how much increase could be allowed over a period of <br /> time. But, again, those are technicalities that I am sure our <br /> wise and good people can come to grips with. <br /> The third item that I would address is the <br /> matter of when we vote on any changes that you folks propose <br /> to be made in the County Charter.;-It is my understanding that <br /> to hold a special election in this county comes to a sum of <br /> some $60,000 give or take a few. The charter itself mandates <br /> that the charter be reviewed every ten years. It does not <br /> mandate, however, exactly when any revisions must be voted on. <br /> I believe it states that it can be at a general election. At <br /> the next general election or at a special election. I would propose <br /> that while what-we discuss as changes are important, they are <br /> certainly not earthshattering and do not require a special <br /> election. What you good folks decide to put before the public <br /> to be voted on could just as well wait until the 1980 general <br /> election as to spend $60,000 for a special election in 1979. <br /> Thank you, that is all. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: With regard to the concept of <br /> one-man, one-vote, do you have any idea as to how many council <br /> members we should have? <br /> MR. ANDERSON: I personally favor nine. I <br /> would see the island being divided into 9 districts of approxi- <br /> mately equal population. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: What happens if the boundaries <br /> are not within the so-called communities that have rather close <br /> relations to one another? <br /> - 5 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.