Laserfiche WebLink
presented by the Chamber of Commerce and our West Hawaii Com <br /> mittee; as a result of observing the council at work in Hilo; <br /> studying the budget hearings and the figures themselves ; and <br /> also reviewing the concerns;--of the citizens that have appeared <br /> to testify with you starting in N aalehu and completing last <br /> week in Waimea. <br /> If we are to have good county government, we <br /> have to have good men in it and basically the impact of those <br /> men are most important in the two classifications that we have, <br /> the mayor' s office and the membet's of the council . <br /> Whether we have a good mayor or not is the direct • <br /> responsibility of the voters. There is nothing much that can be <br /> done to help them on that regard. <br /> As regards to the council , we could have refine- <br /> ments of the Charter Commission , but frankly, there is no way <br /> you can legislate good government. So, the question is how do • <br /> we get men of integrity and good capability in the offices of <br /> the council? These are the two facets that I am interested in <br /> addressing because I think perhaps this is the most important <br /> thing that can come out of these Charter Commission hearings. <br /> As has been said earlier this evening, I 'm in <br /> favor of nine district elected councilmen. The advantages are <br /> very clear and so I ' ll take them up in the course of defending <br /> the number of nine and also as to how we get them. <br /> Presently, the council is organized as nine <br /> members and the mechanics of the day to day council are grouped <br /> about those nine members so that we don ' t necessarily want to <br /> confuse change for progress. By leaving them nine we do salvage <br /> a great deal of good work , day to day mechanics of input. The <br /> question is more or less than nine? If we had fewer than nine <br /> we would have the problem that there are a number of major <br /> committees. If you have fewer people you have to double up in <br /> some cases. By leaving it at nine your major committees are <br /> assigned to one individual and he has the time to do his home- <br /> work and do his study and consultation without being overburdened. <br /> Furthermore, as we have seen with Mr. Xawahara' s <br /> unfortunate absence, when a member is absent for some time the <br /> functions of the council are handicapped. So, that if we have <br /> nine we get along reasonably well , but if we were down to five <br /> or less , we'd be having a marked change in the functioning of <br /> the council . So, here again the number nine seems quite <br /> reasonable. Also, we have had reference to the historic number <br /> of nine districts and there would be no need to upset that. <br /> Actually, the districts themselves are subdivided into election <br /> precincts. When we come to the question which was raised <br /> recently about what happens with the changing of the census <br /> you wouldn ' t have any major shifts in districts , names or other- <br /> wise, but you would perhaps have a movement of a precinct from <br /> one onto the other to keep a , reasonable balance of one-man , one- <br /> vote. This is going to happen in every census and therefore the <br /> mechanics would exist. The same would happen if we were a <br /> larger state and had more representatives . Since we only have <br /> -10- <br />