|
would be up to the discretion of the Planning Director, either Michael or his successor, that
<br />someone can make an argument, this, we like this for "x" reasons, just like KTA did. And, that's
<br />all we're asking. We're not saying no, and, you know, we don't necessarily want to build, you
<br />know, big, fat, wide roads again. So, but we do have access to the 38 acres on the south side,
<br />yeah, but it's a single access, though.
<br />IKEDA: Can I ask you another question? You know, I'm looking at Condition P that Mr. Fuke
<br />had sent in, and it says something about a 60 -foot wide right-of-way. Is that something that you
<br />guys was looking at instead of the 80 -foot right-of-way?
<br />MATSUURA: The way that I read it now, and I was confused like you, believe me, but the gist
<br />of it, and I could be wrong and you can defer it to the Planning Director, but, it's an 80 -foot wide
<br />right-of-way that we dedicate to the County so that it's seven or eight acres that you're going to
<br />essentially gift to you built up with 80 -foot wide pavement with just it's going to be like
<br />Mohouli Extension but connecting Ponahawai to Mohouli Extension, and
<br />IKEDA: Actually
<br />MATSUURA: without, and then we're asking for only curb, gutter, sidewalk on the
<br />commercial aspects.
<br />IKEDA: IMaija, I don't know if I'm reading this correctly, but I was assuming that it's an 80 -
<br />foot easement with 60 -foot section being paved. Is that what it is?
<br />MATSUURA: That was what we had agreed on back in 2011, 60 -foot paved and with a 20 -foot
<br />right-of-way, and from what I'm hearing is the Public Works doesn't want that. So, if the
<br />condition is 80 -foot all paved, we accept that.
<br />IKEDA: Okay, because I was thinking that I couldn't see how Mohouli Extension running
<br />through your guys' property. You know, it's kinda dangerous to me. I mean, you know, all of
<br />us that live over there, we understand it, and you should, people—see the people drive there.
<br />They're going about 50-60 miles an hour, and it's a residential which is supposed to be 35, so
<br />that was my concern. I think Donn had the same concern, too, because we live in that area.
<br />MATSUURA: We're happy to make a smaller road and not even pave it.
<br />CLARKSON: Natural speed bumps.
<br />AGUINALDO: Mr. Chair, I have a question.
<br />CLARKSON: Please.
<br />AGUINALDO: Mike, so like the condition was like 80 feet, right? Seems like it's too wide.
<br />Traffic, speed—is there any way we can make provision, start `em yet at whatever width and
<br />leave room for expansion if need to, you know, instead of going the whole enchilada one time.
<br />You know, is that—
<br />EXHIBIT C
<br />15
<br />
|