COM 1078.000 2018-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

No. 7555); directly to the east is a neighborhood -commercial (CN -20) zoned parcel, also owned by the applicant. Across the Hawaii Belt Road, and to the east of the subject parcel is the single-family residential 7,500 square -foot (RS -7.5) zoned Pualani Estates Subdivision. Directly south, and adjacent to the subject parcel is agricultural zoned parcels varying between 1 and 5 -acres (A -la & A -5a). 20. FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM): Approximately 90% of the property is located within Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone X, an area considered to have a minimal flood hazard. The remaining portion of the property lies within the FEMA Flood Zone AE, which is a portion of the Wai`aha Drainageway Splitflow #2. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) to allow for improvements and adjustments to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was submitted and adopted by FEMA on September 29, 2017. Currently Special Flood Hazard Areas AE, AEF, and XS affect the subject parcel as designated by the updated FIRM. All development plans, drainage studies, and other related documents shall reflect the September 29, 2017 FIRM. 21. Archaeological/Historical Resources: The applicant submitted a letter from the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) dated August 27, 2008 regarding a revised Archaeological Inventory Survey Report. The report included revised and updated significance assessments and recommended general treatments. SHPD concurred with the revised and updated report as final and stated "[the applicant] may now proceed with preparation of a data recovery plan, burial treatment plan, non -burial site preservation plan, and monitoring plan for the project area." The updated survey of approximately 65 - acres identified 65 sites and 138 features. The sites include platforins, terraces, hounds, modified outcrops, caves, C -shapes, walls, and a historic period roadway and ranching feature. Seventeen (17) sites were determined to be significant, however, they were given a "no ficrther world" recommendation. Forty (40) sites were determined to be significant for their information content but required fiirther work. The remaining seven (7) sites were recommended for preservation. None of the sites recommended for preservation are situated within the subject parcel. The applicant will be required by conditions to implement the recommended treatments and plans -for the archaeological sites on the property. -5-