Laserfiche WebLink
CBB/CLR Pesticide Reimbursement2026 <br />control and $600 per year per acre for CLR control and provided further that no single coffee <br />grower shall receive subsidies that are more than $12,000 per year total. <br />1. Purpose <br />We request the continuation of the subsidy program supporting mitigation and control of Coffee <br />Berry Borer (CBB) and Coffee Leaf Rust (CLR) in Hawaii. Both pests are endemic in the islands <br />and continue to pose severe economic and agronomic threats to the state's $56 million coffee <br />industry. <br />2. Scientific and Economic Basis <br />Coffee Berry Borer (CBB) <br />1. Endemic status: CBB (Hypothenemus hamper) is now established across all major coffee - <br />growing regions in Hawaii. <br />2. Economic impact: Management costs for CBB (spraying, strip -picking, labor) are <br />significant. A recent UHERO study estimated that biocontrol interventions could save <br />growers $141.6 million over 50 years, with benefit -cost ratios exceeding 42:1. (The <br />benefit -cost ratio of 42:1 means that for every $1 spent on biocontrol, farmers could <br />expect to get back about $42 in benefits (through higher yields, lower damage, or reduced <br />costs). <br />3. Persistence: Even with biological control agents (e.g., Phymastichus coffea), CBB remains <br />entrenched, requiring ongoing integrated management. <br />Coffee Leaf Rust (CLR) <br />1. Detection and spread: CLR (Hemileia vastatrix) was first detected in Hawaii in October <br />2020 and spread to Maui, Hawai'i Island, Oahu, and Lana'i within 12 months. <br />2. Severity: CLR can reduce yields by 10-80%, depending on infection levels and farm <br />practices. <br />3. Control costs: Case studies in South Kona showed CLR incidence rising to 77% on some <br />farms within a single season, requiring 5-10 fungicide sprays annually. <br />4. Long-term outlook: Resistant varieties are the only durable solution, but these are not yet <br />widely available. In the meantime, fungicide rotations, pruning, and sanitation remain <br />costly and labor-intensive. <br />3. Justification for Subsidy Continuation <br />1. Endemic nature: Both CBB and CLR are now permanent threats in HawaiTs coffee <br />agroecosystem. <br />2. High management costs: Farmers face recurring expenses for pesticides, biocontrol <br />agents, and labor. Without subsidies, many small farms cannot sustain operations. <br />