My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0376.007 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0376.007 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2008 8:41:55 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:42:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0376
Point
007
Author
Cheryl R. Reis; Marjorie Gushiken
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: P/PC - 5/15/07
Document Relationships
AGE PC 05/15/2007 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Plannning Committee (PC)
BIL 096 Draft 01 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 0376.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Letter dated January 8, 1996 from Planning Department to Dr. Takase <br />re: continued access violations from and to Punahele and health <br />hazard issues. (Exhibit 15) <br />Letter dated June 14, 1996 from Public Works to Planning Department <br />re continued non-compliance with Section D of Ord. 95-33, no access <br />from PPB to Punahele Street. (Exhibit 16) <br />Letter dated June 14, 1996 from Planning Department again re access <br />violation to Haitsuka's baseyard from Punahele Street and the penalty <br />on failure to comply. It should be noted that compliance generally was <br />for one to two weeks following these cautions and violations would <br />begin again generating more complaints from us. This process was <br />repeated through 2006. (Exhibit 17) <br />My letter dated October 2, 1996 to Ms Virginia Goldstein and Ms Donna <br />Kiyosaki, County Engineer re: our concerns with the forthcoming <br />PPB/Rehab development based on lack of enforcement and followup <br />with the same recurring problems. We specifically addressed that the <br />"subject property" remain residential. Our experiences with Haitsukas <br />had more than confirmed our worst fears of moving vehicular traffic in <br />that location. (Exhibit iii) <br />Letter dated October 14, 1996 from Concept Development's Bruce <br />Hansen re informational/airing of concerns meeting with neighbors of <br />PPB development. "Subject property" wasn't to be used except for <br />utilities. (Exhibit 19) <br />Final Plan Approval for Rehab dated November 6, 1996 to Bruce <br />Hansen from Planning Department contingent on fulfillment of Ord 95- <br />33 and requirements stipulated by subdivision application 96-055. It <br />specifically addresses landscaping to be installed between the common <br />boundary of Rehab and adjoining Punahele residential properties. <br />(Exhibit 20) <br />Final Plan Approval dated February 21, 1997 to Bruce Hansen from the <br />Planning Department again sets out the conditions to be complied with <br />for final approval -the Ordinance 95-33 with landscaping buffer across <br />adjoining common boundary of PPB with five residential lots and no <br />access from Punahele. (Exhibit 21) <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.