My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0760.000 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0760.000 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2017 11:32:38 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 8:05:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0760
Point
000
Author
Stephen K. Yamashiro, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Communications - File Code
CHA
Document Relationships
AGE PC 04/14/1998 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 211 Draft 01 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1996-1998
COM 0760.001 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
COM 0760.002 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
COM 0760.003 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
COM 0760.004 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
COM 0760.005 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
COM 0760.006 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
REP PC 105 04/14/1998 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\1996-1998\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
actions that the Planning Director makes and yet the body is, that's hearing the appeals is also in <br />the same department. I have to spilt staff in the same way I think that Corporation Counsel would <br />need to split their staff so that it's clear who represents essentially the Board and who represents <br />the Director and/or the Commission. So we talked about Corporation Counsel as perhaps as <br />neutral a body could be the agency which would house the Board of Appeals. Now although the <br />Corporation Counsel Wurdeman has agreed to this, I know that there has been internal discussion <br />on that the same kind of conflict though will arise within the Department. So the question is so <br />where do we house the Board then? <br />MCINTOSH: I would take it out of the County Building totally. <br />GOLDSTEIN: No, no, but that's -. <br />MCINTOSH: I would take the whole process out of the County Building and then hire <br />independent counsel to process the paper if that's what it takes and to be totally independent. <br />Because whenever an action of the Board of Appeals goes to court, you have one member of the <br />Corporation Counsel arguing in favor of the Board of Appeals, and then you have Fred Giannini <br />arguing for the Planning Commission, and then you may have someone else representing the <br />Department of Public Works arguing yet another standpoint. So here you have, and we have a <br />situation like that right now where the Board of Appeals overturned an action of the Planning <br />Commission, it has been appealed to the court, and so now we have the County in effect suing <br />itself. <br />GOLDSTEIN: That's right. <br />MCINTOSH: And so I think that the resolution of this issue is not going to be solved by <br />moving the paper from, or the function. I mean you and I have talked about this for years that it <br />really, some serious consideration needs to be given to maybe taking it out of the County Building <br />totally so that the Board of Appeals has its own independent counsel, and maybe that independent <br />counsel then processes the paper. I think this issue needs a lot more discussion before I'm <br />comfortable making a recommendation to the County Council. And I also want to clarify that the <br />issues that you talked about quasi-judicial, you're talking about special permits, for instance, that <br />we issue, and the interpretation has been that those can be appealed to the Board of Appeals and <br />then to Third Circuit Court. You're clarifying that so that the Board of Appeals is taken out of <br />those processes -. <br />GIANNINI: Right. <br />MCINTOSH: Totally and it goes directly to Third Circuit Court. <br />GIANNINI: So which means that any, that will get to the situation of any of the <br />permits, by quasi-judicial action we mean like special management area permits, use permits, <br />special permits under 15 acres, shoreline setback variances and any of those would no longer, <br />510 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.