Laserfiche WebLink
<br />F. Historic/Cultural/Archaeological Resources <br /> <br />For the same reason noted above, no commissioned <br />archaeological inventory survey and cultural assessment study was <br />conducted of the subject site. The industrial use ofthe site for well <br />over 50 years reduces the prospect of finding any archaeological <br />remains. <br /> <br />Nonetheless, during the course of redeveloping this project, should <br />any anticipated archaeological features or sites be uncovered, work <br />in the affected area will immediately cease and the applicant will <br />notify the Planning Department. <br /> <br />G. Valued Cultural Resources <br /> <br />In view of the recent Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and <br />"Ka Pa 'akai 0 Ka 'Aina"decisions, the issue relative to native <br />Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed. <br />Specifically, there must bea discussion of the cultural, historical, <br />and natural resources and associated traditional and customary <br />practices of this site. <br /> <br />In this situation, the subject site is not adjacent and/or proximate to <br />the shoreline. As such, fishing and/or coastal access is not an <br />issue. <br /> <br />It is not known whether the subject or immediate surrounding area <br />was ever used for the gathering of plants by native Hawaiians. <br />However, as the site has been used industrially for well over 50 <br />years, it would appear very unlikely that the site would serve such <br />purpose today and/or in the recent past. <br /> <br />The site also appears not to have any known archaeological <br />features on the subject property. <br /> <br />Based on the above, it does not appear that the project would have <br />any potential adverse impact relating to the cultural and historical <br />resources of this area. <br /> <br />H. Water and Coastal Resources <br /> <br />The subject site is located over a mile from the coastline. As such, <br />coastal impacts resulting from discharge of drainage systems from <br />the site should not be significant. Being a non-coastal property, no <br />coastal access will be affected. <br /> <br />7 <br />