Laserfiche WebLink
Draft 2 eliminates the procedures for adopting and developing the capital improvements <br />budget and program (CIP) listed in Draft 1. <br />15. ANNUALREPORT <br />Draft 1 requires an annual report to monitor progress towards achieving the 400+ goals <br />and policies. Draft 2 now contains 300+ objectives and policies. We are not clear how it <br />would be implemented without a lot of time and effort that could be preferably spent on <br />implementation rather than monitoring. The annual report is or should be part of the <br />Council's annual program and budget review of the Planning Department's program <br />review since the General Plan is part of the Department's program. The capital budget <br />presentation by the Mayor and the Planning Department serves as the reporting <br />mechanism to reconcile and prioritize competing community needs. <br />Draft 2 eliminates the annual reporting requirement. <br />16. AMENDMENT PROCEDURES <br />Draft 2 deletes the amendment procedures and refers to its adoption in Chapter 16. <br />Amendment procedures may need to change from time to time. During the recent <br />interim period, various amendment procedure revisions were transmitted for <br />consideration. One procedural amendment was adopted. Technically and legally, EIS <br />requirements in Chapter 343, HRS, are triggered when a General Plan amendment is <br />initiated (except for comprehensive reviews). We are not aware of any environmental <br />assessment made for the prior amendment procedure bills --nor should a change to the <br />procedure produce such a trigger. To avoid this potential question for future Councils, <br />the General Plan amendment procedures are drafted and transmitted in a different bill. <br />For convenience, the General Plan may be reprinted with the amendment procedures. <br />ELEMENTS <br />17. The significance of changes in each element is subjective. Therefore, the Chart entitled <br />'General Plan Draft 1 to Draft 2 -Proposed Modifications & (Amendments)' should be <br />referenced to understand what text was kept, edited, deleted, or added. It also provides <br />the reason for the action. We have attempted to align Draft 2 with the core of Draft 1, <br />except in those areas discussed above. <br />Developing new landfill sites on the island has not been the policy in recent years. <br />Therefore, this Solid Waste' policy was deleted and replaced with a new policy: "Explore <br />and evaluate waste reduction techniques, processes and facilities to lengthen the life of <br />the landfill(s) with energy conversion being a desirable component. <br />LAND USE ELEMENT <br />18. FLOATING ZONE (GP -Chapter III, Part 5) <br />10 <br />