Laserfiche WebLink
regulatory framework at the General Plan level for various reasons. Yet this approach <br />has had its shortcomings in the last 34 years, and there is growing public resentment <br />stemming from deficiencies in mid-level infrastructure planning and properly coordinated <br />public funding. <br />Draft 2 attempts to diminish reliance on the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) <br />Map through the articulation of vision statements, objectives, policies, and standards. <br />Rather than painting specific land uses onto a map, the goal is to encourage <br />development planning efforts to provide greater guidance and specificity. When <br />development plans are adopted, the myriad of land use colors on the LUPAG map would <br />be subject to the direction of the development plan. Thus, the LUPAG Map would <br />ultimately show general 'forms' or'patterns' of settlement, such as the urban form, rather <br />than specific urban designations (e.g., high density, medium density). In 10 years, the <br />comprehensive review should depict the 'urban' forms. <br />We believe attention will properly focus on the written policies in the General Plan over <br />time. <br />3. Does the current General Plan have a time horizon? (see GP -Chapter II, Part 1) <br />No. Although the General Plan mandates a 10 -year comprehensive review, it does not <br />establish a contextual framework for this long-range plan. A 20 -year horizon for the <br />vision is established consistent with the timeframe used for employment and population <br />projections when preparing for the comprehensive review. <br />4. What is the role of a vision statement? (see Bill No. 163, Draft 2, SECTION 1 -Purpose <br />and GP -Chapter II, Part 1) <br />At numerous public hearings, the Planning Committee received testimony suggesting <br />the General Plan contain a vision statement. Individual council members voiced a desire <br />to include a vision statement as well. <br />We understand vision statements to be projections of the most desirable concepts for <br />growth and lifestyles in our community. <br />We recommend both island wide and geographical district vision statements. The <br />purpose of the island -wide vision statement is to express fundamentals that are <br />important to citizens as applied to the entire island. On the other hand, geographical <br />district vision statements provide a view of those aspects citizens have identified as <br />important to preserve, enhance, support, and encourage within each district. Vision <br />statements capture the character of the district and are vital to understanding community <br />values, its goals, and its interrelationship with other districts. Taken together with the rest <br />of the General Plan, vision statements serve to guide future planning and <br />implementation efforts. <br />The vision statements in Draft 2 are the product of collaboration with each council <br />member representing the geographical district or, in many cases, portions of several <br />districts. We recognize that vision statements must be the outcome of community <br />participation and must be revisited based upon public input at future meetings of the <br />Planning Committee, Commission or Council. <br />