COM 0687.000 2004-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Stacy Higa, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 6 available upon completion of Section 3. 1, 'Conditions to Kau Commitment' as stated in the Water Agreement. Improvements in Section 3.1 include outfitting Well No. 2 with a 700 GPM submersible pump and providing the necessary appurtenances, a transmission line between Well No. 2 and Department of Water Supply's Puukala Tank, and a water system on the property built to the Department of Water Supply's standards." A self-contained private wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system is proposed for the project. The capacity of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) will be approximately 850,000 gallons per day. The wastewater treatment plant will produce "R- 1" recycled water in accordance with the Department of Health requirements for golf course irrigation. Recycled water will be the primary source of golf course irrigation water. In a memo dated July 12, 2005, and Department of Environmental Management as stated that no County sewer system is planned for this area. Conditions of approval will be included to mitigate any potential impacts from the development. An Archaeological Inventory Survey was completed by Rechtman Consulting, LLC and finalized in June, 2003. Of the 83 archaeological sites recorded during the study, 12 were recommended for preservation, 30 were recommended for data recovery, and no further work was recommended for the remaining 41 sites. Twenty-two (22) of the eighty-three (83) sites as well as a 65 -acre dryland native forest were proposed for preservation. In its April 5, 2004 letter, the DLNR-HPD stated that there are no known or recorded burials in the proposed Petition Area therefore currently not necessary to comply with Chapter 6E-43. However, the applicant must comply with Chapter 6E-43 if human remains or burials are inadvertently discovered during mitigation. The applicant will be required to develop and implement a Preservation Plan and a Data Recovery Plan. The applicant states that a Data Recovery Plan will be developed and submitted to the Department of Land and Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division (DLNR- SHPD) for review and approval for all sites recommended for data recovery. A Preservation Plan will also be prepared and submitted to the DLNR-HPD. In a letter dated March 10, 2005, the DLNR-HPD has stated that of the 83 sites in the project area, all but two were assessed as significant under Criterion D, and four sites were assessed as significant under Criterion E for their religious/ceremonial association. No burial sites were identified during the inventory survey. Twelve sites will be preserved. Data recovery will be undertaken at 28 pre -contact sites and one historic period site. The SHPD-HPD has accepted the significance assessments/recommended treatments and addendum report.